The right to remain silent apparently.
g
On 12 Dec 2003 at 21:43, Julian Davies wrote:
> I believe that legally Walt is blessed by both freedom of assembly and
> freedom of movement. Now, which applies?
>
> Julian
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "GeoW" <gwsears@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:05 AM
> Subject: [OM] Walt's restrictions
>
>
> >
> >
> > On 11 Dec 2003 at 21:48, ll.clark@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > > In <200312111625.AA3479437344@xxxxxxxxx>, on 12/11/03
> > > at 04:25 PM, "Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> > >
> > > >Of course, is there some law that requires retired folk to wear
> > > >undergarments if they're not going beyond the end of the
> > > >driveway?
> > >
> > > NO!
> > >
> > > -
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > > les clark / edgewater, nj / usa
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> >
> > Why restrict yourself to the end of your driveway when there's a
> > whole
> world out
> > there, no laws apply.
> >
> > I really must think about this some more.
> >
> > GeoW
> >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|