I'm not sure I get the point, Mike? Are you saying that there somehow are
problems with the digest?
--thomas
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:56:37 -0800
Mike <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Well the latest digest just rolled in and as an exercise I culled out
> the actual posts from the chafe. Here is the result. Digest as received
> 135kb. Actual posts OT or not, 46kb. Since I included most of the
> headers (and the tamale and haggis posts :>) that latter figure is
> conservative. So it appears that the "meat and potatoes" such as they
> are account for about 1/3 or less of the digest.
>
> FWIW
> Mike
>
>
>
> The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
> To contact the list admins:
> mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem"
>
--
------------------------------------------------
Thomas Heide Clausen
Civilingeniør i Datateknik (cand.polyt)
M.Sc in Computer Engineering
E-Mail: T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
WWW: http://voop.free.fr/
------------------------------------------------
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|