If you are talking about a 24 shift direct shoot and a 18mm corrected one
(through scanner and software) may be the 24 is better. My personal
experience with both 18 and 24 shift was they are having similar resolution,
I won't use the word one blew away the other.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Skip Williams" <om2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 8:39 PM
Subject: [OM] Re: can your digital do this?
>
> Bob and I did several tests with the 16, 18, and 24-shift and the 24-shift
blew them away with it's superb resolution. (These tests were with scanned
film, not a DSLR) My conclusion was if you're shooting architecture, an
~18mm lens corrected with software (and I used very, very good software)
DOES NOT measure up to a dedicated shift lens.
>
> Skip
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|