Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Quality of digital vs film

Subject: [OM] Re: Quality of digital vs film
From: Skip Williams <om2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 11:05:08 -0500
More validation that 5-6 MgPx is good enough for 95%+ of photographs taken 
today. 

The rest can use MF/LF scanned with a flat-bed to get the best quality.  (I'm 
not including traditional, film-to-paper solutions as I'm not in that market 
anymore.)

I don't print 30x40's very much....Heck, I don't print 16x20's much, and 
digital is great at those sizes.

Skip


>
>Subject: [OM] Re: Quality of digital vs film
>   From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>   Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 09:25:08 -0500
>     To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>Also see this page:
><http://www.sphoto.com/techinfo/dslrvsfilm.htm>
>
>Chuck Norcutt
>Woburn, Massachusetts, USA
>
>
>
>
>
>The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
>To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus 
>List Problem"


The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus 
List Problem"

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [OM] Re: Quality of digital vs film, Skip Williams <=
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz