scharfsj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> <snip>
>
>Well, my experience is just the opposites find IS to be useful
>for shooting with relatively slow lenses in low light with longer
>exposure times. Perhaps my panning technique allows me to hold a
>camera really steady at slow shutter speeds and the IS helps out even
>more. But I have to disagree with C.H. and Moose
>
Not disagreeing with me! I only asked if it might help. Now I know.
><snip> I've done some motorsports stuff with my 28-135 with
>the IS turned on, and with this non-L lens, the IS is even slower and
>it really gets in the way of getting a picture at times, waiting for
>the gyros or whatever they are to "spin up".
>
The A1 shouldn't have that kind of latency. It is a completely different
design concept using motion sensors in the camera to move the sensor
around in the opposite directions. I still doubt it would be much help
in your kind of photography, but who knows?
Moose
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|