Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Silly Polaroid SprintScan 4000 question

Subject: [OM] Re: Silly Polaroid SprintScan 4000 question
From: Tris Schuler <tristanjohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:41:52 -0800
The scanner itself does a remarkable job extracting information. I feel 
confident if you pursue this correctly you'll be up and running, perhaps 
with little expense on your end.

If and when you do have the chance to exhibit your work (SS4000 or no) 
please share with us. Especially anything in B&W, which is my favorite.

Tris

At 11:17 PM 2/16/2004 -0600, you wrote:

>Thanks Bill, Tris, Tom, and Skip:
>
>I'm looking into the support network online for extra info and I'll be
>calling Polaroid next. What is disturbing to me is that there is an
>official question space on the Polaroid website that is actually a
>black hole. You can ask all you like, there is no answer.
>
>Worse, they just posted that the SprintScan would not work with Mac OS
>X 10.3 but done so in such vague terms that it is nearly meaningless
>(Yup, I use a Mac).
>
>I value the scanner as it does have a reputation for extracting a lot
>of information from 35mm film and it is otherwise in like new
>condition. I also read it did a nice job with black and white
>emulsions, which to me is very interesting. So when I finally sign up
>for my first photo class and something acceptable comes out of a roll,
>I do wish to be able to post a few scans for critiques!
>
>Regards from Texas,
>
>Phil
>
>PS - apologies to the moderator as I have again sent a reply from the
>wrong account. This one should be right, though.


The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus 
List Problem"

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz