Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Camera Quandary - OM vs. N*kon vs L*ica

Subject: [OM] Re: Camera Quandary - OM vs. N*kon vs L*ica
From: "Piers Hemy" <piers@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 12:32:53 -0000
I agree Chuck - though I have seen one OM-4 fitted with the 4Ti hotshoe
(which has five contacts in all).  Whether the additional contacts were
functional is open to debate! 

Piers

-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Chuck Norcutt
Sent: 25 February 2004 12:23
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Camera Quandary - OM vs. N*kon vs L*ica

To the best of my knowledge an OM-4 with new (OM-4T, 4Ti) circuit will
reduce the current drain of the OM-4 when "off" but will not operate the
F280 in Super FP mode.  The 4Ti has additional contacts on the hotshoe that
the 4 does not have.

Chuck Norcutt

Jim Brokaw wrote:
  > OM-4 with new circuit, clean one should be $350 or so.
> F280 flash if you think you will do -a lot- of fill flash. Otherwise 
> there isn't that much to recommend it over the T-32,


The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe:
mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"


The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus 
List Problem"

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz