Fascinating. I'm going to read up a bit on that equipment. Do you
reckon from your experience there are fun (inorganic) things that
could be done with OMs and endo-/ bore scopes and look good and may be
overlooked by many photographers? Something Gord might call
bleeding-edge photographic art and might not cost as much a sports car
in terms of equipment? Hey, endoTOPE might blaze new trails...
Phil
>From: "James N. McBride" <jnmcbr@xxxxxxx> Subject: [OM] Re: OT How
>many cameras? [ENDOSCOPES] Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:25:48 -0700
>
>
>I'm mostly retired now but still do a few assignments involving
>equipment failure analysis and legal evidence documentation. Being
>able to make photographs in places where others can't is a selling
>point. Sometimes you need to see inside places without destroying
>the thing to open it for examination. My son is the chief engineer
>for a utility that generates electricity with hydraulic bulb
>turbines. They have had some very interesting failures that required
>internal examination of big stuff. The image resolution of good
>endoscopes or bore scopes can be amazing. I've used bore scopes for
>years but they always belonged to someone else. Now its time for me
>to have one that is mine, all mine. /jmac
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|