Hi David:
You are right! Why didn't I see that. The 100 has 15 more mm and it has .8
more stop. But the 85 that I have is too new, not even broken in, I bought
it with a tip from George from a Swiss Photographer called Lutz. (obviously
born to be a photog) and brought it over from Europe as it is so smooth and
shiney. But since you have clearly demonstrated the folly of having it -
would $85.00 be asking too much?
Gord
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Cochran" <cochran@xxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 5:07 AM
Subject: [OM] Re: 85/2 vs 90/2 vs 35-105
> Hi Gord:
>
> Keep your 100mm/2.8 and 50mm/3.5 and by all means sell me your 85/2.0 .
> You dont need that 85mm it is closer to the 90mm than the other two. Dont
> delay and follow my advice! ;-)
>
> peace
>
> david
> >
> > Hi Z's
> >
> > While we're on this thread...I'm considering a 90mm macro, but I would
then
> > sell my 100mm/2.8 and my 50mm/3.5. I would keep my 85mm/2.0. Good
trade-off?
> > What is the opinion, is my rationale sound?
> >
> > Gord
>
>
> The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
> To contact the list admins:
mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem"
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|