Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: olympus Digest V1 #68

Subject: [OM] Re: olympus Digest V1 #68
From: Gregg Iverson <golftooter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:15:20 -0500
Since it was a group of people it must be rated XXX.  But since it was a 
family reunion it should be labeled redneck.  Actually, they were posing so 
we could verify next year just who showed up this year. :-)

gregg


>Hi Stephen and Gregg:
>
>I wasn't questioning the quality at all- by rating I meant were they "R" or
>"X" rated shots in a dark room. Ozzies would like the irony, it was just
>having a little fun.
>
>Gord (chastened but never chaste)
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Stephen Scharf" <scharfsj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 9:15 PM
>Subject: [OM] Re: olympus Digest V1 #68
>
>
> > >
> > >
> > >Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:16:04 -0700
> > >From: "Gordon J. Ross" <gordross@xxxxxxx>
> > >Subject: [OM] Re: Why go digital??
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "SAS Teachers"
> > >
> > >>  I also have noticed how easy it is to shoot digital in a room that is
>too
> > >dark for film, slide or even negative, and still get photos that look
>great
> > >when they are printed.
> > >>
> > >>  gregg
> > >
> > >
> > >Hi Gregg:
> > >
> > >and the rating on these pictures would be ........?
> > >
> > >Gord
> > >
> >
> > Gord,
> > Before you blow Gregg off too casually, consider reading the article
> > below on Rob Galbraith. The photo editor of no less than Sports
> > Illustrated says that one of the principal reasons that they went to
> > digital was EXACTLY the reason Gregg cites above. Makes for pretty
> > dang interesting reading, IMHO.
> >
> > Photo Editor Steve Fine:
> >
> > "The pictures themselves, Fine says, have changed the look of the
> > magazine. "For years [with film], we've been fighting a battle
> > between sharpness and grain, especially in low-light shots. You try
> > to sharpen and you just end up building more graininess. I'm amazed
> > at the quality we're getting in low-light shots off our digital
> > files. We're running [low-light pictures] up to two-page size that we
> > could never have done before."
> >
> > http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-6453-6821
> >
> > I guess if it's good enough for SI, it's good enough for us...
> >
> > -Stephen.
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > 2001 CBR600F4i - Fantastic!
> >
> > The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> >
> > To contact the list admins:
>mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem"
>
>
>The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
>To contact the list admins: 
>mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem"



The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus 
List Problem"

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz