on 3/24/04 12:46 AM, Gordon J. Ross at gordross@xxxxxxx wrote:
> I am buying a 21/2.0, do you have
> any observations so far? (I can still back out) For that matter, any
> listers with comments on the 21/3.5 vs the 21/2.0 kindly offer them.
>
> Gord
>
> PS Glad too see that the 100 made the short list.
You -don't- want to 'back out'. You want this lens, you just don't know it
yet. Once you get it, you will understand. The 21/3.5 is a great lens,
small, wide, fast enough, and with a good 'look' to the images. The 21/2.0
is all the slower lens is, but -more- of -everything-, if I'm making sense.
--
Jim Brokaw
OM-'s of all sorts, and no OM-oney...
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|