Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Why Film instead of Digital

Subject: [OM] Re: Why Film instead of Digital
From: Earl Dunbar <edunbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 20:53:55 -0400
Ken:

Thanks for the analysis.  The two factors which m.atter most to me are anclival 
quality and the tactile qualities of a wet print.  In addition, no one has 
mentioned platinum, palladium and other non-silver processes.

Earl
AG Schnozz wrote:
> Joel asked:
> > Is the proper way to digitize BW to scan the film?  or is it
> > better to
> > make wet prints of the negative that realize a "performance"
> > of sorts
> > (Adam's lingo) and then scan that on a good flatbed?
> 
> I personally like the scanned chemical print.  An added
> advantage is that you don't actually need to get the print
> "exact".  In fact, a little bit of flatness is good, because the
> scanning tends to expand the range somewhat.  Saint AA even
> wrote about that in "The Print".
> 
> Chemical B&W prints actually can cost quite a bit less than
> inkjet output.  Especially if you are like me and tend to
> generate large expanses of Zones 0-III.  Can you say "bronzing?"
> 
> Joel, since I am right down the road from you, I'd be happy to
> print some of those rolls for you.  <smile>
> 
> I've chatted with a couple "fine-art" B&W photographers that use
> digital for the entire process and output with various
> multiblack inking systems.  It is very tempting, but the reality
> is, they spend more time per print than they ever did in the
> darkroom. Cost savings?  None.  No matter how "profiled" the
> system is, each picture has it's own nuances that require
> eyeball adjustment after the inks dry.
> 
> A B&W darkroom really doesn't cost very much to either setup or
> operate. Paper is frequently less expensive than inkjet paper
> and chemicals are pretty cheap.  Time spent per print is usually
> less than in digital (expecially when batch printing). You can
> make some pretty huge prints, depending on your equipment.  It
> doesn't take up much space and the investment doesn't become
> outdated in six months.
> 
> AG-Schnozz
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway 
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/
> 
> The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> 
> To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus 
> List Problem"
>       


The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus 
List Problem"
        

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz