Ah, in the manual or in real life? Is this one of the Olympus 'proposed'
lenses or one they really made.
I've had a number of very early 24/2.8 lenses pass through my hands and have
never seen an i.zuiko.
Tom
>
> Hi all,
>
> >From: "CyberSimian" <OlySimian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >My 24mm f2.8 is an H.ZUIKO (I just checked). If you have an I.ZUIKO,
there
> >must have been two versions of the single-coated 24mm f2.8 with different
> >numbers of elements. The serial number of mine is 174xxx.
>
> Most 24/2.8 zuikos (MC included) are 8-element designs, so the SC ones are
> marked H.ZUIKO. But I've got a very old (dated 0173) ZILG manual where the
> 24/2.8 is a 9-element design, thus marked I.ZUIKO. This lens was
physically
> longer (36mm vs. 31mm) than the 'later' type.
>
> ...
>
> Carlos J. Santisteban
>
> <cjss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <http://cjss.galeon.com>
>
>
>
> The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
> To contact the list admins:
mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem"
>
>
>
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|