Yeah, that's what tripped me up. I didn't, of course, have the lens I
sold on hand, so I just grabbed the old Lens Group Manual with the
letter designations and quoted from it. I'm sur what I had was an
H.ZUIKO. There probably never was an actual production I.ZUIKO 24/2.8.
OOOOPs
Moose
cjss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>Most 24/2.8 zuikos (MC included) are 8-element designs, so the SC ones are
>marked H.ZUIKO. But I've got a very old (dated 0173) ZILG manual where the
>24/2.8 is a 9-element design, thus marked I.ZUIKO. This lens was physically
>longer (36mm vs. 31mm) than the 'later' type.
>
>
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|