Sebastian,
Also consider the Zuiko 200/4. It is quite small for the focal length, and
weighs only around 500 grams. The 85-250 is almost 900 grams! That's a
difference to certainly consider.
Also- I don't see your need for a lens to cover 50-250. Maybe you are only
considering this range because that's what the dealer has available? But to me,
I think it is too much of an overlap with your Tamron 35-105. With your lenses
you already have 135 and 300 covered, so, maybe a simple 200 will do it for
your needs? I wouldn't get a 50-250 or an 85-250 just to get in the 200-250
range. Just my opinion.
George S.
sepp-adam@xxxxxx writes:
> I would like to buy a Tele Zoom for myself to my equpiment. I allready have
> a Tamron 35-105/2.8 the 135/2.8 OM and the 300/4.5 OM - well and a 400/4
> Tamron ;-))
> The steps between those focal lenght are to big, so i am looking for a lens
> between 50mm an 200-250mm
> To the choice stands (dealer) a tokina 50-250 4-5.6 (nice Macro? No Tripod
> Mount :( ) or an olympus 85-250 5.0 (Tripod Mount and Zoom ring [i prefer
> Zoom Rings])
> Which one should i take?
> Any other Idea, because those lenses are not very fast...
> What about the Tamron 80-200/2.8, Tripod Mount but no Zoom Ring :( - but
> this lens is really rare here in Germany...
>
> greetings
> Sebastian
>
>
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|