Or multiple digital exposures...
tOM
On 20 Jun 2004 at 23:03,
C.H.Ling <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> All the DSLR I have used (E-10, 10D and E-1) have better capture range than
> slides but if one want the max capture range, color negatives is still
> better.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > I've been thinking about that since your last post on the subject. The
> > response curve of DC is linear, without real shoulders and toes. Once
> > (perhaps already) the total range of brightness recorded by a DC is as
> > great or greater than that of film, and when the resolution of tones
> > recorded is sufficient, one should be able to get the shoulder and toe
> > effect through curve adjustment in a photo editor. Of course, I already
> > use curve adjustment often on scanned film.
> >
> > Moose
> >
> > AG Schnozz wrote:
> >
> > >Hey, back to topic again...
> > >
> > >I've been scanning some slides the past couple of days.
> > >Shoulder and Toe of film still is far superior to digital. Good
> > >enough reason to keep the OMs happy.
------- Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur -------
,__@ tOM Trottier +1 613 231-6115
_-\_<, 758 Albert St.,Ottawa ON Canada K1R 7V8
(*)/'(*) N45.412 W75.714
<a href="http://Abacurial.com";>Abacurial Information Architecture</a>
---------------
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too
much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.
-Thomas Jefferson 1743-1826)
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|