> -----Original Message-----
> on 27/07/2004 14:49, Wilcox, Joel F at joel-wilcox@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > I'm quite sure I was searching for a substitute for the
> long-awaited,
> > frustrated Zuiko 200 macro. Watch out for zignetting at
> the long end.
> Hi Joel,
>
> I'm watching at this very moment the first test I run on Provia 100F,
> comparing the 200/4 and the 85~250 @ 200mm, coupled to the
> 65~116 @ 65mm,
> stopped down both at f11, using a t-32. Picture is of a box
> of colored glass
> little balls children play with (don't know how they're named
> in English).
> No differences nor even on color rendition, when projected on a silver
> plated screen using a Kodak Carousel at a quite respectable size. No
> vignetting of course.
> Nxt test will be w/tube at 116mm - when I get an OM2 body again.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Fernando.
Well, more power to you!
Did you extend the hood? I probably did. I wonder if that had anything
to do with it my vignetting?
Joel W.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|