Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: OM2s/135-2.8/35-70 100$ shipped-- is that good?

Subject: [OM] Re: OM2s/135-2.8/35-70 100$ shipped-- is that good?
From: ClassicVW@xxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 17:57:50 EDT
It could be a Fang, or it could be a disaster.
I always ask myself: "What is he really trying not to say...?"

"Worked last time I checked" could mean --- 
"I never even looked at this camera I found."

"need batteries" could mean--- 
"It's as dead as a doornail, let me just say I never put batteries in it, and 
that won't be dishonest, would it?"   

"Mirror in great condition" = "Everything else is so dirty, the mirror looks 
great!"

"Lenses dusty" = "The lenses are cloudy."

"No scratches on the optics that I could see." = "There's certainly a few 
scratches, 
I'll just say I couldn't see them, musta checked them when I didn't have my 
glasses on."

Be careful,
George S.


 iddibhai@xxxxxxx writes:

> -Olympus OM-2s manual focus SLR, Auto/M/A/S modes
> Worked last time I checked, needs batteries, mirror in great condition
> -Olympus 135mm, 2.8 manual focus fixed focal length lens
> -Access 35-70, 2.8-4.2 manual zoom lens
> Lenses are in great condition, dusty, but no scratches on the optics  
> anywhere I could see.
> A brief google search tells me this is a classic........Camera PACKAGE  
> $100 shipped
> 
> that's a fang, to my knowlegde, certainly for the 135-2.8 zuiko.
> 



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz