Hi Moose,
Are you saying that it is reading a tag of some kind?
Joel W.
At 09:54 PM 8/6/2004 -0700, you wrote:
>#3 is using the settings in the camera and the WB it chose and would use
>for JPEGS, not some generic, non-image specific default.
>
>Moose
>
>Joel Wilcox wrote:
>
> >At 10:17 AM 8/6/2004 -0500, I previously wrote:
> >
> >
> >>3) conversion plus auto (does it all for you)
> >>
> >>#3 makes the image look just like you used auto WB in the camera: might be
> >>OK but might not -- a crap shoot
> >>
> >>
> >After deciding that #2 was the way to go, I tried #3 on every subsequent
> >scan -- sorry, I mean "conversion image" -- and #3 has since the first few
> >images always been better! So I reckon my method will be just to let the
> >converter have its way and try to improve on it only if I don't like the
> >results. But so far, this just got a lot easier. Nice little plug-in.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|