Gee, your example is lovely in itself.
I also find the shadow/highlight tool seems to work best to boost the
range at the bottom end of an image that is well exposed to start with.
What you did goes beyond that.
Winsor
Long Beach, California
USA
On Aug 12, 2004, at 11:27 PM, Moose wrote:
> It certainly is a powerful and useful tool. I could not get results in
> the shadows with it from the first image that were as good as the
> combination I did. With a more "normal" exposure and by using a higher
> contrast setting, I could have gotten all the data into the one file so
> the Shadow tool could bring it up. However, I didn't want to do that,
> as
> I wanted as much tonal range as possible up in the highlights to
> capture
> all the subtle details in the petals. You can see what I was after here
> <http://moosemystic.net/Gallery/CRW_0195sam.jpg>.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
