Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Ah, Bokeh! Or is it Hokey?

Subject: [OM] Re: Ah, Bokeh! Or is it Hokey?
From: "Piers Hemy" <piers@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:01:03 +0100
I am with you on that Donald - it's a very slight difference.  A paper which
makes clear (rather, makes 'stark') the differences can be found at
http://www.trenholm.org/hmmerk/ATVB.pdf 

Piers

-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Donald MacDonald
Sent: 26 August 2004 17:24
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Ah, Bokeh! Or is it Hokey?


On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:12:34 +0000, Walt Wayman <hiwayman@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> If anybody can see any difference, I hope they'll 'splain it to me.  I 
> guess I'm just not all that sensitive, because bokeh has never been 
> that important to me.  Unless it's really bad and/or the subject is 
> really boring, I usually don't even notice it.
>
> http://home.att.net/~hiwayman/wsb/html/view.cgi-photo.html--SiteID-724
> 214.html 
> http://home.att.net/~hiwayman/wsb/html/view.cgi-photo.html--SiteID-724
> 215.html
>
> Walt, the bokeh clod
>
>

Well IMHO, the second one takes it by a nose, but don't ask me why. It may
be nothing to do with bokeh, contrast or colour, which look pretty much the
same to me.

D.


--
Donald Neil MacDonald BA DipLIS
www.skelpitheid.com

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz