Talking about resolution I have to step in again, it is never possible that
a 5MP E-1 or 6MP 10D is better than ISO100 slides. During my Europe trip I
have a few slides that are taken with the Zuiko 21/2 and E-1 with 11-22 (at
11mm). There is one example, don't complaint about the slightly different in
object size, the resolution different between the two is very obviouse.
http://www.accura.com.hk/P8193517.jpg (1.1MB, 11mm at F4, 1/800s)
http://www.accura.com.hk/P_06.jpg (3.2MB, 21/2 at F5.6, OM4 auto)
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wayne S" <om4t@xxxxxxxx>
>
> The other thing I have been noticing is the result of scans versus the
E-1.
> I use the LS-4000 scanner and am wondering if I am able to get all the
> resolution out of the slide film. The E-1 shots equal or better the OM
> shots much of the time. Maybe it is the lower vibration, maybe it is the
> lenses, or maybe it is the scanner? I'm still trying to sort it all out.
> I don't have a high powered loupe.
>
> Wayne
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
