Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: lubing the winder

Subject: [OM] Re: lubing the winder
From: "John Hermanson" <omtech@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 08:55:00 -0400
Diagram is correct.  O-ring snaps onto lip on underside of ZC1978.  After
assembly, O-ring is pressing against inside of gear of main mechanism plate
ZC1963.
_________________________________
John Hermanson
Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
21 South Lane,
Huntington, NY, 11743-4714,
631-424-2121, www.zuiko.com
_________________________________
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Fernando Gonzalez Gentile" <fgnzalez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 7:30 AM
Subject: [OM] Re: lubing the winder


> on 16/09/2004 04:12, Tim Hughes at timhughes@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> Thanks for your data.
> > If anybody can identify a source other than Olympus for the O-ring, I
would be
> > interested to hear about it.
> I will search for this O ring next week, since I'll have to work for the
> next 24 hours at a hospital.
> >
> > Although replacing the o-ring is not too difficult it is quite a chore
> > reassembling the whole thing,while not trapping/breaking the small
fragile
> > wires which are often glued in place. In general just desolder the wires
so
> > the parts are disconnected while repairing or you are guaranteed
problems.
> > Some parts are easily damaged by soldering, like the 250 shot back
> > connector/sw. Desolder at other end of wire to avoid problems.
> Not that difficult for me, I reasembled the unit without braking any wire
> neither loosing any screw [I thought to myself during the procedure I
could
> be a good surgeon puting stends and all that in my next life :^)]
> Didn't need to desolder anything, just observe very carefully how are
wires
> arranged before and after unscrewing/removing ZC198300.
> Difficult part was screwing PSK 14x3SH, putting on the same axis ZC123400,
> CE009900, ZC123300, and ZC197800. Beware CA872900 is left handed and not
> magnetized.
>
> What I don't finish to understand is why CE001900 is drawn *below*
ZC197800;
> should it be placed *between* ZC197800 and ZC197800 ?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Fernando.
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz