I'm talking about physical pixel size here. LCDs are still around
0.29mm. CRTs are 0.25 or lower. Looks small on paper, but it's
definately noticable. However I did prefer the LCD's geometry...
Daniel
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:12:55 +0800, C.H.Ling <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> May be you had a 1st generation LCD, I don't see how the dot pitch of LCD is
> larger than CRT. Now my 17" LCD is running at 1280x768 pixel.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daniel Tan" <aureliax@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> >
> > LCDs are more "crisp" than "sharp". The larger dot pitch of LCDs stop
> > it from being "sharp".
> > Either way, the slow refresh (25ms) and native resolution was bugging me.
> >
> > On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:39:12 +0800, C.H.Ling <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hard to imaging anything sharper than a LCD, technically it seems
> impossible
> > > unless you had not used native resolution on your LCD or the phase
> setting
> > > was wrong.
> > >
> > > C.H.Ling
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|