Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] CCD vs CMOS more articles for technologists

Subject: [OM] CCD vs CMOS more articles for technologists
From: Tim Hughes <timhughes@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 22:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
Moose quoted my post :
>>
One issue mentioned is the fact that the readout speed becomes a problem for 
CCD as the pixel 
count gets large. TheCMOS devices can readout in parrallel reducing data rates 
to the A/D etc if you 
duplicate digitization. This keeps amplifier readout/digitization noise down as 
bandwidth is then 
greatly reduced. 
>
And then went on to comment:
>>
Which is what Nik*n is doing with 4 separate data channels amplifiers 
and 4 A/D converters in the D2X.
<<
There are actually a number of other advantages apart from the noise /bw/speed 
tradeoff I mentioned.  If the duplicate hardware is implemented right the gain, 
and offset for each color channel can be set individually. In most cameras 
there is only one amplifier for all three colors, before digitization occurs.  
This means that the camera sets the gain for that (single) channel so that the 
brightest color in the scene does not overload the A/D convertor.  Effectively 
this limits/reduces the measureable dynamic range and bit depth for the other 
colors and hence can increase the digitization and other noise for those 
channels.  With seperate channels, dynamic range (offset and gain) is optimized 
for each color.  At first look this sounds like it would increase power, but in 
reality the analog preprocessing can significantly reduce digital signal 
processing requirements and the result is often a large decrease in power. 
(Nucore has made a business out of this i.p.) 
 
Regards,
Tim Hughes


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz