You think the 4/3 mount is smaller than the OM mount?
Winsor
Long Beach, California
USA
On Sep 28, 2004, at 8:47 AM, Walt Wayman wrote:
> Admittedly, I assumed, although only for a millisecond, that the
> E-300 mount was a smaller yet mount than the smaller E-1 mount, but I
> quickly got over that misconception and realized that it was not in
> fact a smaller smaller mount but the same smaller size smaller mount,
> the two smaller mounts being equally small, i.e., identically smaller,
> in each or either instance, as the case may be.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|