Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Foveon X3

Subject: [OM] Re: Foveon X3
From: Skip Williams <om2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:36:15 -0400
>From my wanderings, people using the Sigma cameras report very "film-like" 
>results with smooth tonal transitions, etc.  But the hardware implementation 
>leaves something to be desired, as I remember.  There were lots of complaints 
>about usability, range of ISO's, file formats, etc.  I also remember that a 
>large percentage of users were either wedding or studio photographers, who can 
>control their environment much more than many other types of photographers.  
>That's very similar to the pigeonhole that the Kodak cameras are in, where 
>they're very good in the studio at low ISOs, but mediocre elsewhere.

In the end, it's an interesting technology and very elegant.  But it's not for 
me.  I've stuck my neck out far enough with the E-System right now.

Skip


----- Original Message ---------------

Subject: [OM] Re: Foveon X3
   From: "John Hermanson" <omtech@xxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:14:51 -0400
     To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>

>
>Exactly!  The ads suggest the Foveon chip is capable of amazing performance, 
>but test reports have not reflected that at all.
>
>John Hermanson
>Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
>21 South Lane,
>Huntington, NY, 11743-4714,
>631-424-2121, www.zuiko.com
>_________________________________
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 7:22 AM
>Subject: [OM] Re: Foveon X3
>
>
>>
>> Read the reviews of the Sigma SD9 and SD10.
>>
>> Theory = Good
>> Results = Bad
>>
>> Tom
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Gareth.J.Martin" <g.j.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: "om" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 7:05 AM
>> Subject: [OM] Foveon X3
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>          I was just reading some of the more recent posts and a few
>>> mentioned the Foveon X3 chip. I've heard of it but didn't know what it
>>> is so i had a good read of their website. Foveon seem to make some major
>>> claims about how their chip is like film and produces results comparable
>>> to film. I can seem how the chip could be much better than an ordinary
>>> CCD or CMOS chip but am a little dubious. Has anyone any experience in
>>> using the Foveon X3 chip and if so does it produce better, more
>>> emulsion-like quality images? What about capturing highlights and
>>> lowlights too? Sorry, just curious! Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> All the best,
>>> Gareth.
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>==============================================
>List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz