Hi Bill
In film photography the lens is the key - and you can control reception with
your choice of film -- but I would have to argue that in digital - the
camera that houses the sensor is more important than the lens resolution.
The sensor is more limited than the lens so a more refined lens won't
accomplish much.and much of what you 'capture' will be determined by the
electronics of your camera. . As a layperson this is as much a question as
it is a statement. Worth discussing at any rate.
Gord
> On 19 Oct 2004, at 2:48 pm, NSURIT@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> For someone who
>> has neither, I'd probably buy the Evolt over the e-1, to get my feet
>> wet and
>> then move to the e-whatever when it is released.
>
> It struck me that it would be better to buy the cheaper body and more
> expensive lenses (don't know if it will be possible to get them
> packaged this way round) as the bodies will get outdated much quicker
> than the lenses. That is unless in lens image stabilisation comes out.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|