Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Tamron 80-200/2.8 was Wooo Hoooo . . .

Subject: [OM] Re: Tamron 80-200/2.8 was Wooo Hoooo . . .
From: Andrew Gullen <andrew.gullen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:18:41 -0500
on 2004/10/31 9:17 PM, Jeff Keller at jrk_om@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> 
> End of hood is 1.75" beyond end of lens, 3.74" inside diameter.
> Tamron hood labeled 82FH
> 

Excellent - thanks.

on 2004/11/01 9:29 AM, Skip Williams at om2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> 
> With all that glass, it's important to try and buy a lens with the hood.  The
> difficulty in finding a hood, and the low incremental price of a lens with a
> hood over a bare lens would lead me to never buy a bare lens.  If you're
> looking for a deal, I'd hunt for a lens with a broken or missing tripod foot
> first, as the design of the tripod mount wasn't that good and tends to break
> with fatigue.  Substitution of a slighly-modified Olympus removable tripod
> ring is a much better solution anyway.

That's a point. Looks like the parts *I* may have to supply are: hood, foot,
front cap and rear cap. It does add up.

Andrew


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz