Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Olympus Trouble

Subject: [OM] Re: Olympus Trouble
From: "John Hermanson" <omtech@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 08:17:53 -0500
You're right, it shouldn't be interpreted as a sign of trouble.

John Hermanson
Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
21 South Lane, Huntington, NY, 11743-4714,
631-424-2121, www.zuiko.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Skip Williams" <om2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 1:07 PM
Subject: [OM] Re: Olympus Trouble


>
> I'm not sure if that indicates trouble.  Companies that bring outsourced 
> production in-house typically are saying that those product lines are too 
> important to keep outsourced.  In the end, it could easily reduce costs 
> too if they don't have to expend too much capital.
>
> Skip
>
>
> ----- Original Message ---------------
>
> Subject: [OM] Olympus Trouble
>   From: Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>   Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:58:49 -0800
>     To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>>
>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>Content-Type: text/plain;
>> charset=ISO-8859-1;
>> format=flowed
>>
>>
>>Olympus to hike in-house digital camera output
>>



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz