Joe Friday: "Just the facts, M'am"
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of hiwayman@xxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 10:51 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: If you were only allowed three (3) types of OM body.....
Why not? I voted for a black OM-4T, a black OM-4Ti, and a champagne OM-4Ti.
That's three different bodies. That was the question -- different bodies!
What's the problem here? Did some of you not understand the question? :-)
Walt
--
"Anything more than 500 yards from
the car just isn't photogenic." --
Edward Weston
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Stephen Troy <sctroy@xxxxxxxxx>
> At 06:35 PM 11/19/2004 -0000, you wrote:
> >
> >Very interesting feedback and I think there were about 26
> >responses.Out of interest I did a quick tally....... 26x3 = 78 "would
> >include " votes. These were 29 (4/4ti) 20 (1/1n) 12 (2n) 7 (3/3ti) 5
> >(2S) 3 (2000) 1 (30) 1 (M1).
> >
> >Getting more scientific and probably arbitrary (and definitely
> >outwith my
> >sphere) I applied a weighting to the choices given (3 for 1st choice, 2
for
> >2nd and 1 for 3rd)
> >26 x 6 = 156 "first choice" votes
> >
> >These were 53 (1/1n) 49 (4/4ti) 22 (2n) 13 (3/3ti) (10 2S) 7(2000) 1
> >(30) 1
> >(M1)
> >
> >Any Conclusions?
>
>
> Yes. Only on this list could 26 people vote 29 times for a camera
> (the 4/4Ti).
>
> Steve Troy
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|