| Subject: | [OM] Re: Scanners |
|---|---|
| From: | James Royall <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 24 Nov 2004 06:39:52 +0000 |
> > For the vast majority of uses, including at least 11x14 prints, > anything > over about 24-2700 dpi probably doesn't buy you much of anything. It does allow you the luxury of cropping to compensate for lousy framing at the time the shot is taken. I just printed a near A4 size print from about 1/4 of the negative area, because I took the shot at a red light sitting in my car, and couldn't get out to get any closer! It looked fine, if a little grainy. Scanned on a Microtek Artixcan at 4000 dpi. James ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: another 135mm, focal length no one likes, Gordon Ross |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Flash Q and minor rant, Andrew Fildes |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Scanners, Moose |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Here goes...., Matthew Born |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |