But some sellers make such a point of saying that a MF lens with an AF
adapter fits an AF body, that I have to look at the lens pretty carefully to
be sure it is a MF. (of course the box made this one clear it's not MF).
-jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Piers Hemy" <piers@xxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 1:48 AM
Subject: [OM] Re: Tamron 35-105
>
> The latter, unfortunately
>
> AF lenses are not Adaptall
> Adaptall lenses are not AF
>
> --
> Piers
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Bernard Frangoulis
> Sent: 08 December 2004 09:41
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [OM] Tamron 35-105
>
> On *bay: 3856181366
>
> Is this the lens John Lind bought some time ago (i.e., an Adaptall lens),
or
> is this strictly a Nikon AF lens (no interchangeable mount)?
>
> Bernard
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|