They all are very nice Graham!
Jim Couch
GeeBee wrote:
>Hi Jim,
>
>Right way up:
>http://www.geebeephoto.com/temp/Olympus/Welford_12a.htm
>
>I thought this would be the one to use because of the noose hanging from the
>tree but is got lost in the reflection:
>http://www.geebeephoto.com/temp/Olympus/Welford_14.htm
>
>This was my second choice for the treatment [right way up :-) ]
>http://www.geebeephoto.com/temp/Olympus/Welford_13.htm
>
>Thanks for looking.
>
>--Graham
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jim Couch" <jamesbcouch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: 15 December 2004 19:37
>Subject: [OM] Re: Welford Northamptonshire #12
>
>
>
>
>>OK, I get it now! I could not figure what was going on there! How about
>>posting it 'right side up' for us to compare?
>>
>>Jim Couch
>>
>>
>>GeeBee wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Others have commented about the 'look' of the Welford shot. > >
>>>Thanks for looking.
>>>
>>>--Graham
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>==============================================
>>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>==============================================
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>==============================================
>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|