I am not against digital. I just don't accept the 4/3 system.
I will be able to use films and digital (not shorter than
APS size CCD and not right now for digital) with the same lenses.
And I would like olympus did it...
In my last mail, I just wanted to point that n*kon, l*ica and
eps*n/c*sina produce D-cameras usable with Analog lenses and
a crop factor between 1.6 and 1.3 not 2 as E-1.
Hope you are right saying that E-1 is the beginning of better
cameras but not for me.
Merry Christmas to the list.
Christian
Selon Jeff Keller <jrk_om@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> You might end up changing your mind.
>
> The 4/3 sensor size can probably give more resolution than most 35mm SLR
> users get with their film cameras. Sure the digital wide angle lenses will
> probably diffraction limit sooner (7mm at f8 is a pretty tiny opening) but
> you can change the ISO setting when you change lenses to match the usable
> aperture range. The cost and weight of the 4/3 system telephotos should
> eventually be better than 'full frame' digital cameras.
>
> Film still has some definite advantages; resolution with ISO 100 film, wide
> selection of Zuikos, & archiving slides is fun compared to digital files but
> the balance will constantly shift away from film. However digital can right
> now save a LOT of time!!! and the instant feedback is valuable. The E-1 is a
> very nice camera which will hopefully be the beginning of better cameras.
> -jeff
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <fischerchristian@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: [OM] Re: OM-D
> > Sure, I will never spend even 1 Euro-cent for 4/3 and e-something.
> > Christian
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|