Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Canon EOS 300D (OT, in case it wasn't obvious!)

Subject: [OM] Re: Canon EOS 300D (OT, in case it wasn't obvious!)
From: "IanG" <I@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:51:31 -0000
I was wondering how anybody could have problems focusing an 18mm..... if
anybody with one is near me and would like to trial it on a 1D2?

-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Moose
Sent: 07 January 2005 06:44
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Canon EOS 300D (OT, in case it wasn't obvious!)

Andrew Fildes wrote:

>'cos with ageing eyes like mine, a split image finder would be a VERY 
>great help when using manual lenses like OM Zuikos. We're talking about 
>a very small finder and what looks sharp on the screen afterwards often 
>is not. And standing there chimping to check focus at 100% size is 
>bloody useless unless you're doing landscapes or macro.
>If a split image screen was available at a reasonable cost, 
>
The third party price is pretty scary!

>I'd fit one 
>tomorrow. Early high level EOS bodies had them available.
>
Still true of the full frame EOS DSLRs.

>Using the Zuik 18mm on a 10D I've had a significant number of focus
failures - 
>that's why I succumbed and got the Canon 17-40mm.
>
Yeah, I can't imagine how one could focus the 18mm in that viewfinder. 
Maybe with their equivalent of the Varimagni.

Moose



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz