Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: The (well almost) definitive word on T-32 coverage

Subject: [OM] Re: The (well almost) definitive word on T-32 coverage
From: Siddiq <iddibhai@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 19:51:52 -0800
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 21:42:42 -0400, Wayne Culberson  
<waynecul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Anyways, flashes are something I have to think about a bit, as I've been
> asked to do some wedding pics in a few weeks. Obviously I won't be using  
> a
> 24mm lens much for that, but I should at least try to get away from  
> straight
> on flash for some of the shots. These will be all indoor shots requiring
> flash, because of the winter season and because of the evening wedding-  
> no
> daylight left at that time of day. I've never done much of anything but
> straight on flash, so I could definitely use some improvement and  
> challenge
> in that area of my photography.
>
> Wayne

lumiquest diffuser, the bigger one, fits well on a T32, and i used that  
exclusively during my sister's wedding. also make sure to have portrait  
film (or if digital, a low saturation mode).

-- 
/S
aim:iddibhai
icq:104079359
email/msn:msidd004atstudentdotucrdotedu


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz