Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: EPSON 2200 PHTO STYLUS PRINTER

Subject: [OM] Re: EPSON 2200 PHTO STYLUS PRINTER
From: Skip Williams <om2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:34:03 -0500
It's a winner.  BTW, you should expect a replacement for the 2200 at PMA in the 
spring, so I'd expect 2200 prices to drop soon or generate a rebate.

Skip


----- Original Message ---------------

Subject: [OM] Re: EPSON 2200 PHTO STYLUS PRINTER
   From: "DICK LAGUE" <rlague@xxxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 07:24:17 -0800
     To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>

>
>Thanks Chuck,  I have heard good things about them and I am thinking of
>getting one to replace my 1270.
>
>This seems to be a phenomenal printer, and a good value for the money.
>
>Dick Lague
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
>Behalf Of Chuck Norcutt
>Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 4:35 AM
>To: Olympus mail list
>Subject: [OM] EPSON 2200 PHTO STYLUS PRINTER
>
>Dick asked:
>Any opinions on the Epson 2200?   Thinking of getting one and wanted to
>know what the groups experience might be with this printer.
>------------------------------------------------------------
>Superb printer.  I use one ocassionally that is owned by a friend.  Most
>
>recently I used it to produce some B&W prints from a restoration job I 
>had done.  A 1940's 8x10 with literally thousands of cracks in the 
>emulsion.  I wanted regular chemical prints but the lab had tried three 
>times to make a B&W print from the digital image and none of them suited
>
>me.  Always too dark and contrasty.  They finally grew exasperated with 
>me and offered me my money back to quit pestering them.
>
>That's when I turned to the 2200 which did produce some beautiful 
>prints.  I should note that the printer was setup for ordinary color 
>work and did not have the special sets of inks that are available for 
>strictly B&W work.
>
>No scientific data here but the surface of the 2200 prints strikes me as
>
>physically soft and prone to scratching if roughly handled... at least 
>as compared to prints from my old HP P1100.  However, the image quality 
>from the P1100 just doesn't compare.  The 2200 blows it away.  The 2200 
>owner suggests that the prints will harden with a couple days drying 
>time.  I don't know.  So far, whatever I've printed has been turned over
>
>quickly to someone else and I have advised them to mount the prints 
>under glass.
>
>On the 2200 owner's wall there are some 13x19" portraits of young girls 
>done on water color paper.  Stunning.
>
>Chuck Norcutt
>
>
>==============================================
>List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================
>
>
>
>==============================================
>List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz