They're Zuikos!... You NEED both!
Julian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 6:41 PM
Subject: [OM] Re: Reflexe Numerique - French review of 4/3 and Evolt/E300
> That's exactly my main gripe and the reason I've come to a resoundingly
> conclusive tentative probably maybe "No" about buying one. If you replace
> the cheapie lens with the better one, what the heck do you do with the
> cheapie? Sell it for $5 on *Bay as a paperweight?
>
> Walt
>
> --
> "Anything more than 500 yards from
> the car just isn't photogenic." --
> Edward Weston
>
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: "Jez Cunningham" <jez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> [snip]
>>They would have liked to see the body available alone so that the
>> more professional 14-54mm f/2.8-3.5 could have been substituted for the
>> 14-45mm
>> f3.5-5.6 zoom.
> [snip]
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|