Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: 35mm f2 or 35mm f2.8 ?

Subject: [OM] Re: 35mm f2 or 35mm f2.8 ?
From: "DICK LAGUE" <rlague@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:03:14 -0800
I have a 35mm 2.0 that I want to sell.  It is in very good condition,
but I just notice the aperture ring is stiff.  Rather than paying for
CLR I will sell it for $90 PayPal.  Is that a fair price?

Contact me if interested.

I also have a nice 35-70 3.6 with caps and rubber lens hood for $125.00

Dick Lague

-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Andrew Gullen
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 5:51 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: 35mm f2 or 35mm f2.8 ?

on 2005/01/16 7:35 PM, Natalia at lilredspy@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Thanks, Bill. I've been reading about these lenses and am inclined to
get
> f2.8 now....due to its  smaller size.  I think my OM-4 and 35mm f2.8
will
> make a swell street combo!

After shooting with a couple of large zooms, I stuck the 35/2.8 on the
OM-20
and went shooting: in the subway, around work, on the rink with my
daughter.
What a delight to shoot with a light kit!

Unfortunately old batteries and -10C don't mix; wish I'd been using the
OM-1. But that's not the lens' fault.

Andrew


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz