But, according to the review on www.dpreview.com the 14-45 is a good
lens ...
Chris
On 16 Jan 2005, at 19:47, Walt Wayman wrote:
> Well, I feel my attitude changing as I type! Now, if they'll just fix
> that software omission I read about somewhere, I might actually...
> No, maybe not. But, then, again...
>
> This would be my first foray into "serious" digital (C-2000Z not
> qualifying) and amounting to kind of a tentative toe in the tide. And
> if I should do so, it would be with the expectation of probably
> upgrading later on to a "more better" camera, so I don't want to start
> off with an inferior lens that I would soon replace and most likely
> never use again.
>
> Walt
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|