Most excellent points. I had not paid attention to the size of a psd
file. Huge difference. Thank you for pointing that out.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Jan 20, 2005, at 3:26 PM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>
> I will not use PSD to replace RAW, as mentioned by many people RAW is
> digital negative and actually, to me it is better than negative. You
> can
> adjust the color temp. very easily, no need to bother with the RGB
> curves.
> It has smaller files when compare with PSD or Tiff and consider you
> have to
> save it 16bit, the file will be very large.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Winsor Crosby" <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>>
>> I have been thinking that archiving the PSD file may be the way to go
>> rather than raw. I can't imagine that PSD would ever become
>> inaccessible. Anyone have a thought on that?
>>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|