At 02:51 PM 1/27/05 -0400, Wayne C wrote:
>
>I think this was partly Brian's point in the case of the reviewer comparing
>the various 50mm's in the article with the 13 or so B&W snapshot type
>images. The reviewer's statement to the effect that there really was no
>better 50mm than the Zuiko 50/2 seems like a mostly subjective one in the
>context of his sample pictures (albeit a statement that might be readily
>accepted on this list without much questioning :-) We're quite willing to
>accept his statement on the 50/2 unchallenged, but quickly bristle at his
>remarks about the Zuiko 50/1.8 :-).
>
Wayne I think you missed the "reviewer's" point. He is a very experienced
pro and equipment reviewer who has obviously done all kinds of 'objective'
testing. What he was presenting was an opinion piece based on all his
testing - that's also part of what he does.
Barry H
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|