on 2005/01/30 5:25 AM, Wayne Harridge at wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
> Thanks for looking Chris, the bottom part of the frame was cropped. It
> doesn't have anything to do with the conversion to mono either as it's also
> quite visible in the colour original, also some other shots from the same
> session taken at different angles show the same pattern regardless of which
> area of the sky was included.
on 2005/02/01 2:40 AM, Wayne Harridge at wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
>> Oooh, I like that. The darkened sky and the straight-on view
>> make it look really foreboding.
>
> Ok Andrew, here is the original uncropped colour version:
>
> http://lrh.structuregraphs.com/images/cn35-886-07-c.jpg
>
> By the way, no polariser used.
So was the sky that dark to the eye? We get skies like that sometimes (like
a few days ago) when cold dry northern air comes down and there isn't a
speck of moisture or haze. If it's that dark a blue there won't be any red
in it.
There does look to be some darkening in the boards at the bottom, so maybe
you're right about falloff.
BTW, I think that was a very effective crop.
Andrew
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
