Winsor Crosby wrote:
>Don't know what you consider to be reasonable cost. If you care about
>having your prints around, unfaded, in 4 or 5 years I would get an
>Epson pigment ink printer like the R800.
>
Non-fading prints are important, and Epson is clearly the leader.
However, that's not the primary reason the R800/1800 ar on the top of my
current wish list.
It's what the prints look like that matters most, and it looks like the
R800/1800 are serious winners there, too
<http://www.photo-i.co.uk/Menus/reviews_frame.htm>.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|