Someone who has had both can probably help in that estimate. The other
side of the equation is that you can buy quantities of the batteries
from suppliers on the internet for less than a dollar each and the
battery replacement becomes a VERY small part of the overall cost of
doing photography. And if you think of it the price difference between
a T and a non T will buy a lifetime supply or two.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Feb 21, 2005, at 10:39 AM, Robert McFetridge wrote:
>
> As a bit of an extension to this string is there someone out there who
> can give some insight as to what the power efficiency difference is
> between the OM3 and the OM 3Ti and the OM4 and the OM 4Ti. I understand
> that the electronic upgrades to the Ti series cameras improved battery
> life but by how much. 10%? 50%? Is this an issue of concern when
> looking at these cameras? An OM3 is significantly less expensive than
> and OM3Ti as has been clear in a number of emails recently.
> bob
> ________________________
> RT McFetridge
> Ottawa, Canada
> E: rmcfet@xxxxxxxxxx
> E: rmcfet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Phone: 613 692 4896
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|