Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: (2) SR44 vs (1) CR1/3N in OM-4Ti

Subject: [OM] Re: (2) SR44 vs (1) CR1/3N in OM-4Ti
From: "John Hermanson" <omtech@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 08:43:27 -0500
Lithium and alkaline batteries will have the shortest life in your camera. 
Use Eveready 357s for longest life.

John Hermanson
Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
21 South Lane, Huntington, NY, 11743-4714,
631-424-2121, www.zuiko.com
Olympus OM Service since 1977
<:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rob Harrison" <robhar@xxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 1:53 AM
Subject: [OM] (2) SR44 vs (1) CR1/3N in OM-4Ti


> Just went to replace the batteries for the first time in my newish-to-me
> OM-4Ti, with the specified (2) SR44's, and found (1) CR1/3N inside. Hmm! 
> The
> discussions I've found so far on the difference don't cover lithium cells.
> Anyone know if one way or the other makes a difference? I tend to favor
> lithium cells in all my other cameras, since they're supposed to last
> longer, but I don't actually know what the voltage decay characteristics
> are.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Rob Harrison
> Seattle (not anywhere near Husky Stadium....)
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
> 



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz