I would add one other characteristic Olli - the shorter the focal length,
the closer the lens will be to the subject at a given magnification. That
(in part) is what makes the 135/4.5 macro lens such a winner - you should
add that to your repertoire too!
As you may have noticed from my recent posts, a friend is using me to sell
much OM gear. Including a 50/3.5, optics spotless, slight bright marks on
the aperture ring, with original front and rear caps and a worn OM lens
pouch.
USD100 shipped.
--
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of orava@xxxxxxxx
Sent: 10 March 2005 07:15
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Having 90/2, should I buy 50/3,5?
Thank you for encouragement and information. Looks like I have to add this
lens to my repertoire.
Olli
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|