So, it's adequate as a nice toy that does not require top-notch performance or
convenience of use... - Phil
On 20:03, Skip Williams wrote:
>
>It's quite a nice lens. I've got one and it's not quite as sharp as
>a 16/3.5, but close. It's HUGE compared to the little Zuiko
>however. I still miss my 16/3.5, but not so much that I'm willing
>to part with the $700 that I got for it.
>
>I'd buy it again in a heartbeat.
>
>Skip
==
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|