I stand corrected!
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:52:54 +0000, Chris Barker wrote:
>Chaps
>You do mean an "E->1" don't you. I am not sure that the Olympus
>marketing department could handle model numbers of less than one ;-).
>Chris
>On 16 Mar 2005, at 00:42, GFaulk7376@xxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>>
>> In a message dated 3/15/2005 6:02:34 PM Central Standard Time,
>> bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>>
>> I'm also certain that when the E-<1 comes out and I buy one, both
>> bodies
>> will immediately drop in price. So you could simply watch this space
>> and buy one
>> of
>> them a week or 10 days after I buy my next body.
>>
>>
>>
>> I've resisted buying an E 1 for this very reason. Now I'm afraid to
>> buy an E
>> -<1 for the same reason. I guess I'll never buy a digital camera. And
>> also,
>> in the past week or so, there was all of this "what's the best Fang"
>> talk.
>> Has anybody ever had a reverse Fang besides me?
>>
>> Gary Faulkenberry
>>
>==============================================
>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================
--
Barry B. Bean
Bean & Bean Cotton Company
Peach Orchard, MO
www.beancotton.com
www.beanformissouri.org
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|